On 10 Aug 2013, at 18:14, mca <mca@amundsen.com> wrote: > Now is the time to register a link relation value with the IANA. > > It takes limited effort, need not slow your momentum and will make it easier to lead future development in this space. > yes, though I think we should have a number of people together first to back the proposed link relation. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5988#section-6.3 My guess is that we would have better chance of success if we can show a mailing list where the issue was debated, a spec that describes the link relation and implementation that use it. > On Aug 10, 2013 12:07 PM, "Henry Story" <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: > > On 10 Aug 2013, at 17:50, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: > > > On 8/9/13 8:34 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote: > >> The protected resource will show you where the acl (meta) data is with the header rel="meta" > > I thought the consensus was: rel="acl" > > > > I guess, we are just going to have to support both, to be safe . > > There are still very few implementations, so this is the point where consensus can > be reached at little cost. > > I don't think that this problem was discussed yet in a forum where the implementers > were present. > > Henry > > > > > -- > > > > Regards, > > > > Kingsley Idehen > > Founder & CEO > > OpenLink Software > > Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com > > Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen > > Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen > > Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about > > LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen > > > > > > > > > > > > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ > > Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Saturday, 10 August 2013 17:03:48 UTC