- From: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 09:38:45 -0400
- To: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>
- Cc: Christopher Gutteridge <cjg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, Michael Brunnbauer <brunni@netestate.de>, "<public-lod@w3.org>" <public-lod@w3.org>
Well, the colon should be. No reason why the / should be in this case. You can't have more than one colon in a URI. (Though you can in what's typed in a browser bar). Also, the TAG is going to eliminate the // soon, which will make everything much simpler. Tim (hmmm ...So what would be the %-encoded version of http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net/uri.html/http://uri4uri.net ?) Tim On 2013-04 -01, at 09:14, Martynas Jusevičius wrote: > Shouldn't the path component of the URIs be percent-encoded? That is, > > http://uri4uri.net/uri/%0Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fdbpedia.org%2Fresource%2FCopenhagen > > instead of > > http://uri4uri.net/uri/http://dbpedia.org/resource/Copenhagen > > Martynas > graphity.org > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Christopher Gutteridge > <cjg@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: >> Well if I've understood correctly, uri4uri is an extreme version of >> reification. rdfs: gave a way to describe a triple in triples but it still >> related resources together, not the identifiers for those resources. That >> makes it impossible to make statements about, say, what authority assigned >> the URI and when. >> >> >> >> On 01/04/2013 08:49, Michael Brunnbauer wrote: >>> >>> Hello Chris, >>> >>> what a great step forward ! Now if the RDF WG would adopt this proposal, >>> LOD and RDF would really be ready to save the world! >>> >>> http://www.brunni.de/extending_the_rdf_triple_model.html >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Michael Brunnbauer >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 12:13:19AM +0100, Christopher Gutteridge wrote: >>>> >>>> Apparently http://uri4uri.net/ launched today and claims to solves many >>>> of the problems of Linked data. It looks promising.. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Christopher Gutteridge -- http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/cjg >>>> >>>> University of Southampton Open Data Service: >>>> http://data.southampton.ac.uk/ >>>> You should read the ECS Web Team blog: >>>> http://blogs.ecs.soton.ac.uk/webteam/ >>>> >> >> -- >> Christopher Gutteridge -- http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/cjg >> >> University of Southampton Open Data Service: http://data.southampton.ac.uk/ >> You should read the ECS Web Team blog: http://blogs.ecs.soton.ac.uk/webteam/ >> >> > >
Received on Monday, 1 April 2013 13:38:58 UTC