W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > May 2012

Re: Decommissioning a linked data site

From: Rufus Pollock <rufus.pollock@okfn.org>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 09:04:18 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEvtuKoKmGpXRhUZmia7TdZEyvnp+iTkWHQZ9hqqxkYb9x5gcw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Cc: Bradley Allen <bradley.p.allen@gmail.com>, "public-lod@w3.org community" <public-lod@w3.org>
On 31 May 2012 00:12, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> wrote:
> Bradley,
> On 30 May 2012, at 23:03, Bradley Allen wrote:
>> I'm regret to say that I'd already nuked the CKAN record by the time this email reached me
> CKAN doesn't actually nuke things that are deleted, it just hides them from view and they can be restored, which I just did for the t4gm dataset:
> http://thedatahub.org/dataset/t4gm-info

Exactly - as per my email just now I wonder if we want a state of
"archived" separate from "deleted" for this. "Deleted" items can get
purged which is not what is wanted here.

> Please update the record to reflect the fact that it's now only a “tombstone” for some data that is no longer available.
> We also need some way to mark this for the LOD Cloud. How about adopting a new tag “lodcloud.tombstone”?


Received on Thursday, 31 May 2012 08:04:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:16:22 UTC