- From: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:57:58 +0100
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- CC: public-lod@w3.org
On 25/03/12 19:24, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > Tim, > > Alternatively, why not use the existing "Link:" header? Then we end up > with the ability to express the same :describedby relation in three > places Which is, of course, in the now-submitted proposal. Dave
Received on Monday, 26 March 2012 07:58:30 UTC