Re: Change Proposal for HttpRange-14

On 2012-03 -22, at 16:21, Jeni Tennison wrote:
> [...]
> 
> Second, a 200 response to a probe URI no longer implies that the probe URI identifies an information resource; instead, this can only be inferred if the probe URI is the object of a ‘describedby’ relationship.

So for any arbitrary web page out there, under this change, I would not
be able to write any RDF about it. Jonathan cannot express what its licence 
is, which was his first.   No one would know whether he or I meant the
web page, or some other thing.  Surely this fails a basic requirement to be able
to use RDF to give information about existing web pages.

Tim