W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > June 2012

Re: Reuse

From: Renaud Delbru <renaud.delbru@deri.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 20:18:54 +0100
Message-ID: <4FE2221E.8020805@deri.org>
To: Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
CC: Aidan Hogan <aidan.hogan@deri.org>, "<public-lod@w3.org>" <public-lod@w3.org>
There is also type properties (with a measure of their frequency 
extracted from Sindice dataset):

http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type (123,994,777)
http://opengraphprotocol.org/schema/type (61,202,581)
http://ogp.me/ns#type (17,184,227)
http://opengraph.org/schema/type (2,443,773)
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/type (11,367,218)
http://dbpedia.org/property/type (120,044)
http://dbpedia.org/ontology/type (65,796)

-- 
Renaud Delbru

On 20/06/12 20:08, Hugh Glaser wrote:
> Yes.
> I think it is meant to happen at the consumer side.
> The consumer initialises their store with appropriate equivalences and sub-thingies for their purposes.
> If you are building an app that expects only one of these, then you aren't really building a Semantic Web app.
> And ideally the app will extend the set as it finds equivalence stuff in the wild.
>
> By the way, we also have (at least)
> rdfs.'comment', dbpedia.'abstract', dc.'description', dcterms.'description', core.'overview', jisc.'description', resex.'detailed-description'
> when the system is trying to pick up something to show as a description of what I am looking at.
> I realise I need to update the list :-)
> I'll probably add your suggestions as well.
> and I have been trying to work if I want fb: as well.
>
> Best
>
> On 20 Jun 2012, at 19:52, Aidan Hogan wrote:
>
>> On 20/06/2012 18:58, Barry Norton wrote:
>>> Does the fact that Web users now need to mark up their pages with
>>> *og:description*, *schema:description* /and/ *twitter:description* not
>>> make anyone in those communities think that maybe /this/ one had a point
>>> in the first place?
>>>
>>> And that maybe this proliferation is actually /harder /to manage than
>>> dealing with (shock horror) multiple namespaces?
>>
>> Did someone say reasoning?!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Aidan
>>
>> P.S.,
>> http://vimeo.com/28667500
>> http://vimeo.com/28667555
>>
>
Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2012 19:19:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:40 UTC