- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:02:04 -0400
- To: public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4E9ED85C.2000205@openlinksw.com>
On 10/19/11 8:49 AM, Paul Wilton wrote: > what is this IE6 that you talk about ? > > :) Internet Explorer 6. The browser that still dominates market share across WWW end-users :-) Kingsley > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Kingsley Idehen<kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: >> On 10/18/11 1:49 PM, Jonathan Rees wrote: >>> I'm not trying to be difficult, I just really don't get what you're >>> saying. >>> >>>>> I believe the your quests was about a case for 303's. Which is >>>>> basically >>>>> another way of seeking a case for slash terminated URIs re. Linked >>>>> Data >>>>> deployment. >>> Not exactly - I'm trying to build a case against hash URIs. >> A case against hash URIs is that your deployment won't play well with IE 6. >> The problem with IE 6 is that it sends # over the wire. Other browsers >> don't. Thus, you (the publisher) has extra work on your hands should you >> want your Linked Data deployment to cater to IE 6 users. This is why DBpedia >> opted to use slash URIs since that meant a single set of re-write rules >> without any exception oriented heuristics for IE 6 user agents. >> >> >> -- >> >> Regards, >> >> Kingsley Idehen >> President& CEO >> OpenLink Software >> Web: http://www.openlinksw.com >> Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen >> Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Wednesday, 19 October 2011 14:02:41 UTC