- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 14:41:27 +0100
- To: Christopher Gutteridge <cjg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-lod@w3.org
On 13 Jun 2011, at 13:02, Christopher Gutteridge wrote: > Option one is to read that as > <http://totl.net/> foaf:member <http://<http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/cjg/> . > which is not true Whether it's true or not is up to the URI owner, because they get to decide what http://totl.net/ identifies. > and prevents us making any statements about the documents directly (ie. license, creator, last modified) How so? Look: <http://totl.net/> foaf:member <http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/cjg/>; dc:license <...>; dc:creator <...>; dc:modified "..."^^xsd:date. Web pages don't have members and groups of people don't have licenses. Anyone with a minimum of intelligence -- human or machine -- can work that out. > What might work better is if you have new predicates which explicitly means <the primary topic of this document has a member who is the primary topic of...> That would work, and I've used that pattern in the past [1], but try explaining that to someone outside this mailing list or writing it down in JSON. > This is more or less what schema.org seems to be doing, if I've understood correctly... No, they just don't give a damn that the same URI ends up being used for a document and a thing. Best, Richard [1] http://vocab.sindice.com/xfn
Received on Monday, 13 June 2011 13:42:06 UTC