W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > June 2011

Re: Schema.org in RDF ...

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 17:49:20 +0100
Message-ID: <4DF4EE10.4070900@openlinksw.com>
To: public-lod@w3.org
On 6/12/11 3:42 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> On 12 Jun 2011, at 11:12, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
>> I've yet to encounter a person who didn't understand the difference between a book about Obama and Obama.
> This has nothing to do with books about Obama.
> It's about the difference between an URI-named resource which can return, say, a JSON representation of Obama; and a URI-named resource that *is* Obama. Explaining why using the same URI for both of those supposedly breaks the Web isn't *quite* that easy.
> Best,
> Richard

It isn't about braking the Web or its AWWW, really. It's about how its 
always been when dealing with data via programs. An Object has:

1. Name
2. Representation Address
3. Actual Representation.

I can even articulate this using the much overloaded "Resource" term by 
saying: courtesy of Linked Data tweak (or evolution) Web Resources now 
has a:

1. Name
2. Representation Address
3. Actual Representation.

Prior to the use of Links for structured data representation a Resource 
had a:

1. Representation Address
2. Actual Representation.

It really is as simple as outlined above.

HTTP explicitly includes the ability to negotiate Actual Representation 
via mime types.



Kingsley Idehen	
President&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Sunday, 12 June 2011 16:49:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:16:14 UTC