W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > July 2011

Re: Dataset URIs and metadata.

From: Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 07:15:23 -0400
Message-ID: <4E2D504B.1000800@durusau.net>
To: public-lod@w3.org
Michael,

On 7/22/2011 11:19 AM, Michael Hausenblas wrote:
>
> Patrick,
>
>
>> So, perhaps one day it will be a standard, but not today.
>
>
> Good catch! Did you join the Pedantic Web [1] group, yet? We need more 
> people like you.
>
Just signed up yesterday.

I have the soul of an editor. ;-)

More than happy to inveigh on behalf of "clean" data but suspect being 
able to cope with "dirty" data is at least as important if not more so.

Hope you are at the start of a great week!

Patrick




>> Hope you are nearing a great weekend!
>
> Yes, indeed, I plan to go to DERI FAWM now and allow my brain to be 
> off-line till 15:00 UTC tomorrow, in case anyone cares ...
>
>
> Cheers,
>     Michael
>
> [1] http://pedantic-web.org/
> -- 
> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
> Ireland, Europe
> Tel. +353 91 495730
> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
> http://sw-app.org/about.html
>
> On 22 Jul 2011, at 16:11, Patrick Durusau wrote:
>
>> Michael,
>>
>> On 7/22/2011 10:42 AM, Michael Hausenblas wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Probably VoID metadata/dataset URIs will be easier to discover once
>>>>>> the /.well-known/void trick (described in paragraph 7.2 of the W3C
>>>>>> VoID document) is widely adopted.
>>>>>
>>>>> greed. But it's not a 'trick'. It's called a standard.
>>>>
>>>> Is it?
>>>
>>> Yes, I think that RFC5785 [1] can be considered a standard. Unless 
>>> you want to suggest that RFCs are sorta not real standards :P
>>>
>> RFCs can be standards, but there is a path by which RFCs become 
>> standards.
>>
>> As of today, the RFC 5785 header reads "PROPOSED STANDARD."
>>
>> So, perhaps one day it will be a standard, but not today.
>>
>> Hope you are nearing a great weekend!
>>
>> Patrick
>>
>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>    Michael
>>>
>>> [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5785
>>> -- 
>>> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
>>> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
>>> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
>>> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
>>> Ireland, Europe
>>> Tel. +353 91 495730
>>> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
>>> http://sw-app.org/about.html
>>>
>>> On 22 Jul 2011, at 15:39, Dave Reynolds wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 09:59 +0100, Michael Hausenblas wrote:
>>>>> Frans,
>>>>
>>>> [snip]
>>>>
>>>>>> Probably VoID metadata/dataset URIs will be easier to discover once
>>>>>> the /.well-known/void trick (described in paragraph 7.2 of the W3C
>>>>>> VoID document) is widely adopted.
>>>>>
>>>>> greed. But it's not a 'trick'. It's called a standard.
>>>>
>>>> Is it?
>>>>
>>>> There was me thinking it was a Interest Group Note.
>>>>
>>>> Is there a newer version than:
>>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/NOTE-void-20110303/
>>>>
>>>> ?
>>>>
>>>> Dave
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Patrick Durusau
>> patrick@durusau.net
>> Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
>> Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
>> Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300
>> Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)
>>
>> Another Word For It (blog): http://tm.durusau.net
>> Homepage: http://www.durusau.net
>> Twitter: patrickDurusau
>>
>>
>
>

-- 
Patrick Durusau
patrick@durusau.net
Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300
Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)

Another Word For It (blog): http://tm.durusau.net
Homepage: http://www.durusau.net
Twitter: patrickDurusau
Received on Monday, 25 July 2011 11:18:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:34 UTC