W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > July 2011

Re: Dataset URIs and metadata.

From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:42:23 +0100
Cc: public-lod@w3.org
Message-Id: <F9E296A1-AFEB-4069-9291-2FAE9C4BE590@deri.org>
To: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>

>>>
>>> Probably VoID metadata/dataset URIs will be easier to discover once
>>> the /.well-known/void trick (described in paragraph 7.2 of the W3C
>>> VoID document) is widely adopted.
>>
>> greed. But it's not a 'trick'. It's called a standard.
>
> Is it?

Yes, I think that RFC5785 [1] can be considered a standard. Unless you  
want to suggest that RFCs are sorta not real standards :P

Cheers,
	Michael

[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5785
--
Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow
LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
http://sw-app.org/about.html

On 22 Jul 2011, at 15:39, Dave Reynolds wrote:

> On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 09:59 +0100, Michael Hausenblas wrote:
>> Frans,
>
> [snip]
>
>>> Probably VoID metadata/dataset URIs will be easier to discover once
>>> the /.well-known/void trick (described in paragraph 7.2 of the W3C
>>> VoID document) is widely adopted.
>>
>> greed. But it's not a 'trick'. It's called a standard.
>
> Is it?
>
> There was me thinking it was a Interest Group Note.
>
> Is there a newer version than:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/NOTE-void-20110303/
>
> ?
>
> Dave
>
>
Received on Friday, 22 July 2011 14:42:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:34 UTC