W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > January 2011

Re: Standardizing linked data - was Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF

From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 22:39:23 +0000
Message-ID: <4D38B99B.5040400@webr3.org>
CC: foaf-protocols <foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org>, Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>, "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@W3.ORG>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
Nathan wrote:
> Dave Reynolds wrote:
>> All this presupposes some work to formalize and specify linked data. 
>> Is there anything like that planned?  In some ways Linked Data is an 
>> engineering experiment and benefits from that freedom to experiment. 
>> On the other hand interoperability eventually needs clear specifications.
> Unsure, but I'll also ask the question, is there anything planned? I'd 
> certainly +1 standardization and do anything I could to help the process 
> along.

or perhaps an IG/XG follow up to the SWEO, taking in to account Read 
Write Web of Data, hopefully with a some protocol or best practice 
report giving a migration path to standardization?

There are certainly plenty of other groups to take in to account and 
consider in all of this, like the WebID XG.


Received on Thursday, 20 January 2011 22:41:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:16:11 UTC