- From: Nuno Bettencourt <nuno.bett@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:44:53 -0000
- To: <nathan@webr3.org>
- Cc: "'Dave Reynolds'" <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>, "'Martin Hepp'" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>, <public-lod@w3.org>
Hi, The doubt just kept on because in all protocols we were still referring to the same URN. Thank you for your explanation, and we've been using the owl:sameAs property for this. Nuno Bettencourt > -----Original Message----- > From: Nathan [mailto:nathan@webr3.org] > Sent: segunda-feira, 17 de Janeiro de 2011 17:34 > To: Nuno Bettencourt > Cc: 'Dave Reynolds'; 'Martin Hepp'; public-lod@w3.org > Subject: Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF > > Nuno Bettencourt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Even though I'll be deviating the point just a bit, since we're discussing URI > comparison in terms of RDF, I would like to request some help. > > > > I have a doubt about URLs when it comes to RDF URI comparison. Is > > there any RFC that establishes if > > > > http://abc.com:80/~smith/home.html > > https://abc.com:80/~smith/home.html > > or even > > ftp://abc.com:80/~smith/home.html > > > > should or not be considered the same resource? > > No, and no such rules can be written (as they are case specific, and all the > above URIs could easily, and often do, point to differing resources) > - if all URIs point to the same resource then it should be stated as such by > some other means, which in RDF would mean owl:sameas. > > Best, > > Nathan
Received on Monday, 17 January 2011 17:54:06 UTC