W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > January 2011

Re: Is vCard range restriction on org:siteAddress necessary?

From: Phil Archer <phil.archer@talis.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 16:00:46 +0000
Message-ID: <4D2738AE.3040508@talis.com>
To: John Goodwin <John.Goodwin@ordnancesurvey.co.uk>
CC: public-lod@w3.org
:-)

I've just been forcing 5 different location addresses for one company 
(BAE Systems) into VCard. In the process, I have asserted that both 
"Filton" and "Samlesbury Aerodrome" are street addresses.

TGIF.

Phil.

On 07/01/2011 15:50, John Goodwin wrote:
>
>> The only problem I see with the example is that we don't have counties
>> in Scotland, we have districts. In Quebec and Louisiana and other
>> historically catholic places we have parishes. Is Scotland a "state"
>> in the American sense, not really. You could use things like vc:county
>> and vc:state and just say that the naming is bad, I guess.
>>
>> Geonames tackles this problem in a language-neutral way by having
>> several levels of administrative areas but they also construct a
>> hierarchy which might be a little verbose for this use case.
>>
>
> As it's a Friday:
>
> six non golden rules of geo:
>
>     1. Any attempt to codify a series of geo rules into a formal, one
> size fits all, taxonomy will fail due to Rule 2.
>     2. Geo is bizarre, odd, eclectic and utterly human.
>     3. People will in the main agree with Rule 1 with the exception of
> the rules governing their own region, area or country, which they will
> think are perfectly logical.
>     4. People will, in the main, think that postal, administrative and
> colloquial hierarchies are one and the same thing and will overlap.
>     5. Taking Rule 4 into account, they will then attempt to codify a one
> size fits all geo taxonomy.
>     6. There is no Rule 6, see Rule 1.
>
> Source:
> http://www.ygeoblog.com/blog/2009/02/23/uk-addressing-the-non-golden-rul
> es-of-geo-or-help-my-county-doesnt-exist/
>
> John
>
> This email is only intended for the person to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential information. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this email which must not be copied, distributed or disclosed to any other person.
>
> Unless stated otherwise, the contents of this email are personal to the writer and do not represent the official view of Ordnance Survey. Nor can any contract be formed on Ordnance Survey's behalf via email. We reserve the right to monitor emails and attachments without prior notice.
>
> Thank you for your cooperation.
>
> Ordnance Survey
> Adanac Drive
> Southampton SO16 0AS
> Tel: 08456 050505
> http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk
>
>
>
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>
> Find out more about Talis at http://www.talis.com/
> shared innovation™
>
> Any views or personal opinions expressed within this email may not be those of Talis Information Ltd or its employees. The content of this email message and any files that may be attached are confidential, and for the usage of the intended recipient only. If you are not the intended recipient, then please return this message to the sender and delete it. Any use of this e-mail by an unauthorised recipient is prohibited.
>
> Talis Information Ltd is a member of the Talis Group of companies and is registered in England No 3638278 with its registered office at Knights Court, Solihull Parkway, Birmingham Business Park, B37 7YB.
>
> Talis North America is Talis Inc., 11400 Branch Ct., Fredericksburg, VA 22408, United States of America.
>

-- 


Phil Archer
Talis Systems Ltd
Web: http://www.talis.com
Tel: +44 1473 434770
Twitter: philarcher1
LinkedIn: http://uk.linkedin.com/in/philarcher
Personal: http://philarcher.org
Received on Friday, 7 January 2011 16:08:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:31 UTC