W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > December 2011

RE : Support for Turtle in WebID

From: SERVANT Francois-Paul <francois-paul.servant@renault.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 12:19:46 +0100
To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
CC: "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
Message-ID: <A7332221009CCC40BC50534A877742452C8C4DFCB4@MBX072.renault.mail.noxiane.net>
+1 for turtle

Best,

fps
________________________________________
De : Henry Story [henry.story@bblfish.net]
Date d'envoi : vendredi 23 décembre 2011 10:31
À : Kingsley Idehen
Cc : public-lod@w3.org
Objet : Re: Support for Turtle in WebID

On 22 Dec 2011, at 22:33, Kingsley Idehen wrote:

> On 12/22/11 4:28 PM, Patrick Logan wrote:
>>
>> The WebID incubation effort is documented at http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebID and there is a discussion on the mail list about supporting the Turtle format. We are looking for input from members of the linked data community generally.
>>
>> Currently RDF/XML and XHTML+RDFa 1.1 are required for consumers of WebID profiles/pages. Support for Turtle would probably be worded as a required addition to these other formats.
>>
>> The incremental cost of supporting Turtle seems fairly low, given support for RDF/XML.
>>
>> Do readers of this list foresee any significant issues with this addition? Would you recommend this addition?
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Patrick
>>
>
> To get the ball rolling.
> +1 re., giving Turtle and RDF/XML equal billing.

Stephane Corlosquet had a good idea on the webid mailing list which is summarised as

MUST support both for consumers, deprecate RDF/XML for publishers, and remove the example
RDF/XML from the spec.

The reason we are asking the wider community is that we want WebID to be an entry point
for people from social networks into the LinkedData community. So even though all our tools
can support every format, if we put that into the spec there is much too high a risk of
cognitive dissonance.

There is an extra very good reason for putting Turtle up there, and that is that
we have a simple SPARQL example in the spec
    http://webid.info/spec#verifying-the-webid-claim
and so that makes understanding for newbies easier.

Henry

>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Kingsley Idehen
> Founder&  CEO
> OpenLink Software
> Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
> Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
> Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
> Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
> LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
>
>
>
>
>
>

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/


-- Disclaimer ------------------------------------ 
Ce message ainsi que les eventuelles pieces jointes constituent une correspondance privee et confidentielle a l'attention exclusive du destinataire designe ci-dessus. Si vous n'etes pas le destinataire du present message ou une personne susceptible de pouvoir le lui delivrer, il vous est signifie que toute divulgation, distribution ou copie de cette transmission est strictement interdite. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, nous vous remercions d'en informer l'expediteur par telephone ou de lui retourner le present message, puis d'effacer immediatement ce message de votre systeme.

*** This e-mail and any attachments is a confidential correspondence intended only for use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient or the agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender by phone or by replying this message, and then delete this message from your system.
Received on Friday, 23 December 2011 11:21:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:36 UTC