- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 14:00:48 -0400
- To: public-lod@w3.org
On 4/22/11 1:35 PM, Bob Ferris wrote: > Hi Martin, > > On 4/22/2011 6:18 PM, Martin Hepp wrote: >> So our only disagreement seems to be about having the cardinality >> info in the label, and I think that, at least for the moment, that is >> the better choice as compared to the alternatives. >> > > I really don't understand why you need this cardinality description in > a label of a universal. If a developer should get informed about such > axioms on a term, then a documentation is a good place for this kind > of knowledge. > For example, my SpecGen v6 fork [1,2] transforms such information > directly from an RDF graph into a readable HTML documentation that > includes RDFa as well, i.e., you even can get the full RDF graph out > of an HTML+RDFa serialized specification documentation. A nice > showcase term that illustrates the defined restrictions that are set > on this universal is olo:Slot [3]. > > Cheers, > > > Bob > > > [1] > http://sourceforge.net/projects/smiy/files/SpecGen/v6/specgen6.tar.gz/download > [2] http://smiy.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/smiy/specgen/trunk/ (this > version is up-to-date) > [3] http://purl.org/ontology/olo/core#Slot > > > Martin, Now here's the effect Bob's approach when passed through our browser page: 1. http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fpurl.org%2Fontology%2Folo%2Fcore%23 -- alternative HTML view of the Ordered Lists Ontology 2. http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fpurl.org%2Fontology%2Folo%2Fcore%23item -- a property description page . -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Friday, 22 April 2011 18:01:10 UTC