W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > April 2011

Re: Labels separate from localnames (Was: Best Practice for Renaming OWL Vocabulary Elements

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 14:00:48 -0400
Message-ID: <4DB1C250.5000608@openlinksw.com>
To: public-lod@w3.org
On 4/22/11 1:35 PM, Bob Ferris wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On 4/22/2011 6:18 PM, Martin Hepp wrote:
>> So our only disagreement seems to be about having the cardinality 
>> info in the label, and I think that, at least for the moment, that is 
>> the better choice as compared to the alternatives.
>>
>
> I really don't understand why you need this cardinality description in 
> a label of a universal. If a developer should get informed about such 
> axioms on a term, then a documentation is a good place for this kind 
> of knowledge.
> For example, my SpecGen v6 fork [1,2] transforms such information 
> directly from an RDF graph into a readable HTML documentation that 
> includes RDFa as well, i.e., you even can get the full RDF graph out 
> of an HTML+RDFa serialized specification documentation. A nice 
> showcase term that illustrates the defined restrictions that are set 
> on this universal is olo:Slot [3].
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Bob
>
>
> [1] 
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/smiy/files/SpecGen/v6/specgen6.tar.gz/download
> [2] http://smiy.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/smiy/specgen/trunk/ (this 
> version is up-to-date)
> [3] http://purl.org/ontology/olo/core#Slot
>
>
>
Martin,

Now here's the effect Bob's approach when passed through our browser page:

1. 
http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fpurl.org%2Fontology%2Folo%2Fcore%23 
-- alternative HTML view of the Ordered Lists Ontology
2. 
http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fpurl.org%2Fontology%2Folo%2Fcore%23item 
-- a property description page .

-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
President&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Friday, 22 April 2011 18:01:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:32 UTC