- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 16:16:39 +0100
- To: public-lod@w3.org
- CC: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Kingsley Idehen wrote: > On 4/22/11 7:36 AM, Martin Hepp wrote: >> See replies inline ;-) >>> Sorry to say this, but I think you are making a mistake. To say that >>> the rdfs:label has to look like a variable name because it is for Web >>> developers sounds to me like you are saying that the javadoc of a >>> method should look like a piece of code because it is addressed to >>> programmers. I refuse to believe that Web developers understand >>> better pseudo code than natural language. >> I will finally give in to use English spacing and capitalization for >> rdfs:labels in GoodRelations, e.g. use >> >> "Business entity"@en for gr:BusinessEntity etc. >> >> But I will keep the cardinality recommendation in the rdfs:label of >> properties, e.g. >> >> serial number (0..*) for gr:serialNumber > > Why not move that to rdfs:comment? +1 seems more like a comment or a description from where I'm standing too, rather than a label.
Received on Friday, 22 April 2011 15:17:46 UTC