W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > April 2011

Re: Labels separate from localnames (Was: Best Practice for Renaming OWL Vocabulary Elements

From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 16:16:39 +0100
Message-ID: <4DB19BD7.70904@webr3.org>
To: public-lod@w3.org
CC: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> On 4/22/11 7:36 AM, Martin Hepp wrote:
>> See replies inline ;-)
>>> Sorry to say this, but I think you are making a mistake. To say that 
>>> the rdfs:label has to look like a variable name because it is for Web 
>>> developers sounds to me like you are saying that the javadoc of a 
>>> method should look like a piece of code because it is addressed to 
>>> programmers. I refuse to believe that Web developers understand 
>>> better pseudo code than natural language.
>> I will finally give in to use English spacing and capitalization for 
>> rdfs:labels in GoodRelations, e.g. use
>>     "Business entity"@en for gr:BusinessEntity etc.
>> But I will keep the cardinality recommendation in the rdfs:label of 
>> properties, e.g.
>>      serial number (0..*) for gr:serialNumber
> Why not move that to rdfs:comment? 

+1 seems more like a comment or a description from where I'm standing 
too, rather than a label.
Received on Friday, 22 April 2011 15:17:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:16:13 UTC