W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > April 2011

Re: Linked Data, Blank Nodes and Graph Names

From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 22:05:20 +0100
Message-ID: <4DA0CA10.3070800@webr3.org>
To: Michael Brunnbauer <brunni@netestate.de>
CC: public-lod@w3.org
Michael Brunnbauer wrote:
> I would prefer a way of skolemizing that does not depend on the graph name
> and can be done by producer *and* consumer of RDF on a voluntary base.
> It should be a standard with reference implementations in all important
> languages for:
> -generating a skolem URI
> -converting an unskolemized RDF serialization to a skolemized one
> -converting a skolemized RDF serialization to an unskolemized one
> It is important that skolem URIs would be recognizeable.

I agree, why a URI? and why invent a new identifier (possibly getting 
all kinds of duplicates over time and creating a management nightmare) 
when often people/machines have already given nodes a form of 

Why turn _:b1 in to some new uri, when often you could just say that 
_:b1 is short for http://example.org/doc#[_:b1] ? (which isn't a valid 
IRI but does have all the beneficial properties of an IRI)


Received on Saturday, 9 April 2011 21:06:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:16:13 UTC