- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 23:58:22 +0100
- To: Ian Davis <lists@iandavis.com>
- Cc: semantic-web@w3.org, public-lod@w3.org
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 14:30:52 +0100 Ian Davis <lists@iandavis.com> wrote: > This is based on the RDF conversion at > http://semanticweb.cs.vu.nl/lod/wn30/ > > How similar is your work to this version? They're similar in that they're both based on Wordnet 3. There are some key differences though: 1. The vu.nl version includes all of Wordnet. Mine is just the nouns. 2. The vu.nl version uses a SKOS-like modelling (though not SKOS): "cat" for example has an rdf:type of something like "Noun". In mine, "Cat" would have an rdf:type of rdfs:Class - i.e. I define each noun as a class. I also include a parallel SKOS mapping of Wordnet 3 and reference between them using rdfs:seeAlso/foaf:focus. 3. I define superclasses to group all reasonable interpretations of English language words. e.g. a "Fool" superclass that is the union of "Fool, as in incompetent person", "Fool, as in gullible person" and "Fool, as in jester". -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Friday, 10 September 2010 22:59:19 UTC