Re: Next version of the LOD cloud diagram. Please provide input, so that your dataset is included.

On Sep 8, 2010, at 01:31 AM, Peter DeVries wrote:

> I am kind of annoyed by the CKAN site.

I'm right there with you, Peter.

Anja, you say "you can edit without logging in" but please note that
the doc page [1] about this "database" says --

   • Please register to CKAN bevor editing or adding any packages.

When I ignore that and do dive into editing DBpedia's listing, 
I discover --

- The "notes" field uses "Markdown" markup, which I've never 
  encountered anywhere else, and must now learn (or fake).

- There must be a singular author, with a singular email address.
  DBpedia doesn't have a singular author, and there are several
  URIs which might be relevant to have here -- and they are not
  mailto: URIs.  The best is an http: URI ... but there is no way
  to make this present, except as part of the literal associated
  with the mailto: URI.

- There must be a singular maintainer, with a singular email address.
  Same issues as with author.

- There are 14+ CKAN Resource links listed [2] in the documentation, 
  but the form appears to only take 5 (at least, 4 were previously
  filled on the DBpedia page, and filling in the 5th didn't magically
  cause a 6th to open, nor was there a link to create a 6th).  OH!
  Until I "Preview" the page -- and now there's an empty set of 
  Resource boxes ... so I can add one more, and Preview, and maybe
  add one more, and Preview, and maybe....  Painful.

- The licensure choices separate CC-ShareAlike and CC-Attribution, but
  do not list CC-Attribution-ShareAlike [3].  cc-by-sa is distinct from
  cc-by -- and also from cc-by-nc-sa (CC-Attribution-NonCommercial-
  ShareAlike), among others.  Clarity of presentation is VERY important 
  for licensing!

- There appears to be an arbitrary limit on the number of "Extras" 
  key-value pairs associated with any given data set ... which means
  that *truly* densely connected data sets will be short-changed.

From all I can see here, this is an RDB-based thing, not RDF-based.  That's disappointing, to say the least.

All in all, the experience is challenging at best, when listing one 
data set.  But I have several more to deal with, and today's the 
deadline!  Hurrah!

*sighs*

Ted



[1] <http://esw.w3.org/TaskForces/CommunityProjects/LinkingOpenData/DataSets/CKANmetainformation#How_do_I_add_a_dataset_to_CKAN_or_edit_an_existing_dataset.3F>
[2] <http://esw.w3.org/TaskForces/CommunityProjects/LinkingOpenData/DataSets/CKANmetainformation#CKAN_resource_links>
[3] <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Text_of_Creative_Commons_Attribution-ShareAlike_3.0_Unported_License>




--
A: Yes.                      http://www.guckes.net/faq/attribution.html
| Q: Are you sure?
| | A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
| | | Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

Ted Thibodeau, Jr.           //               voice +1-781-273-0900 x32
Evangelism & Support         //        mailto:tthibodeau@openlinksw.com
                             //              http://twitter.com/TallTed
OpenLink Software, Inc.      //              http://www.openlinksw.com/
        10 Burlington Mall Road, Suite 265, Burlington MA 01803
                                 http://www.openlinksw.com/weblogs/uda/
OpenLink Blogs              http://www.openlinksw.com/weblogs/virtuoso/
                               http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen/
    Universal Data Access and Virtual Database Technology Providers

Received on Wednesday, 8 September 2010 16:48:21 UTC