W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > June 2010

Re: [foaf-protocols] Yet Another FOAF+SSL ACL Test: ACLs Baton Passing

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 12:22:13 -0400
Message-ID: <4C1CEEB5.5070805@openlinksw.com>
To: nathan@webr3.org
CC: mike amundsen <mamund@yahoo.com>, foaf-protocols <foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
Nathan wrote:
> mike amundsen wrote:
>> <snip from Kingsley>
>> (the resource URL is discoverable via Link: response headers):
>> </snip>
>> <snip from Nathan>
>>> try:
>>> https://ods-qa.openlinksw.com/home/dav/Public/fao_to_sumo_mappings.txt,acl 
>> </snip>
>> Hopefully, the irony is not lost here.
>> Kingsley's message listed a URI of a resource; the LInk header of
>> which pointed to the URI of the ACL resource.
>> IOW, I was given rights to the ACL resource, but not the resource
>> controlled by that ACL resource.
>> Thus, "Discovering the ACL resource via the Link Header" *was not 
>> possible*.
>> So I must ask, Nathan, how did you know the URI of the ACL resource?
>> What have I missed?
> nothing, the demo should have let you have access to both the resource 
> and the ACL, why you didn't I'm not sure - defer to Kinglsey on that 
> one ;)
Yes, you could have just added Mike to the resource ACL since you where 
the only member with privs on both resources :-)

Anyway, fixed now as I don't think my message was clear enough etc..
> Best,
> Nathan



Kingsley Idehen	      
President & CEO 
OpenLink Software     
Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen 
Received on Saturday, 19 June 2010 16:22:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:16:06 UTC