W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > June 2010

Re: [foaf-protocols] ACL

From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 22:41:08 +0100
Message-ID: <4C1BE7F4.7010904@webr3.org>
CC: Story Henry <henry.story@bblfish.net>, Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, foaf-protocols <foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org>
ACL Ontology has been updated, thus we now have:

http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/acl#accessControl
   'The Access Control file for this information resource.
    This may of course be a virtual resource implemented by the access
    control system. Note also HTTP's header  Link:  foo.meta ;rel=meta
    can be used for this.'

Best,

Nathan

Nathan wrote:
> Story Henry wrote:
>> On 20 Apr 2010, at 08:47, Michael Hausenblas wrote:
>>
>>> Nathan,
>>>
>>> That sort of reminds me of something [1] ;)
>>>
>>> So, I asked a round a bit [2] and the answer essentially was: go register
>>> one ... fancy doing it together?
>> The latest document draft-nottingham is here btw
>>
>>   http://cidr-report.org/ietf/idref/draft-nottingham-http-link-header/
>>
>> One could just register it by adding the relation in the acl ontology such as
>>
>> acl:rules a rdf:Property;
>>    rdf:domain foaf:Document;
>>    rdf:range foaf:Document;
>>    ...
>>
>> As you can see in the 5.5 examples, you can have a rel value as a URL. ( So in this it is similar to
>> atom). The only disadvantage then is that you don't get the nice shorthand, for inclusion in Atom XML, 
>> and other documents.
> 
> Yup that's what I went for too :)
> 
> Link: </.wac/everyone.n3>; rel="http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/acl#";
> title="Access Control File"
> 
Received on Friday, 18 June 2010 21:42:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:27 UTC