Michael Hausenblas wrote: > Dave, > > >> We would like to announce the availability of an ontology for >> description of organizational structures including government organizations. >> > > Brilliant! I submitted it now to Sindice [1] and 'registered' the org prefix > in prefix.cc [2] - you might want to support it by voting it up ;) > > Cheers, > Michael > > [1] > http://sindice.com/search?q=domain%3Awww.w3.org+Core+organization+ontology&q > t=term > [2] http://prefix.cc/org > > Dave, seeAlso: 1. http://uriburner.com/fct/facet.vsp?cmd=load&fsq_id=45 -- here its entity ranked 2. http://lod.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2Fns%2Forg%23Organization -- I suspect the ranking hasn't occurred so I used the URI lookup option . BTW - adding rdfs:isDefinedBy relations would make the ontology much more navigable via the interfaces above. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehenReceived on Tuesday, 1 June 2010 20:53:02 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:27 UTC