Re: The Counter Ontology

Sorry Bob, I was reading the RDFS spec in a completely wrong way, as it
says clearly[1]:

    "A typed literal is an instance of a datatype class."

So you're doing it all right, then.

My initial point was merely about putting rdf:value to better use, but I
understand your desire to have a specialized property, and since I can't
readily think of how rdf:value would be better, the co:count solution is
probably fine.

You could make co:count a subproperty of rdf:value, though.

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_literal

-- 
Vasiliy Faronov

Received on Tuesday, 20 July 2010 18:15:40 UTC