Re: Subjects as Literals from Danny Ayers on 2010-07-06 (public-lod@w3.org from July 2010)

From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 10:23:52 +0200
To: Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <reto.bachmann@trialox.org>
Cc: Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, Ross Singer <rossfsinger@gmail.com>, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Message-ID: <AANLkTilXKlf5NajEUNR4wYQ6djErpzS-7gbqwE_HJuuF@mail.gmail.com>

I've been studiously avoiding this rat king of a thread, but just on
this suggestion:

On 2 July 2010 11:16, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <reto.bachmann@trialox.org> wrote:
...
> Serialization formats could support
>
> "Jo" :nameOf :Jo
>
> as a shortcut for
>
> [ owl:sameAs "Jo"; :nameOf :Jo]
>
> and a store could (internally) store the latter as
>
> "Jo" :nameOf :Jo
>
> for compactness and efficiency.

what about keeping the internal storage idea, but instead of owl:sameAs, using:

:Jo rdfs:value "Jo"

together with

:Jo rdf:type rdfs:Literal

?

Cheers,
Danny.

-- 
http://danny.ayers.name

Received on Tuesday, 6 July 2010 08:24:33 UTC