W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > January 2010

Re: Expressing collections in RDF

From: Damian Steer <d.steer@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:24:29 +0000
Cc: public-lod@w3.org
Message-Id: <6C36E9C1-C953-4F3B-B3C6-1CC958A61DAC@bristol.ac.uk>
To: Richard Light <richard@light.demon.co.uk>

On 14 Jan 2010, at 12:04, Richard Light wrote:

> Hi,
> I'm developing my nascent Turtle parser, and working through the Turtle examples [1].  Since my objective is to generate RDF from the parsed Turtle source, I need guidance on whether to implement Collections (test 07) as a linked list of blank nodes, as suggested by the output from test 07, or by the rather nicer rdf:parseType="Collection" construct given in the RDF Primer [2].

If your parser is simply converting turtle to rdf/xml the latter is fine, I suppose. However the point of an rdf parser is to produce triples, and producing the linked list is what I'd expect.

Received on Thursday, 14 January 2010 12:25:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:16:02 UTC