- From: Andy Powell <andy.powell@eduserv.org.uk>
- Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:36:42 +0000
- To: 'Dan Brickley' <danbri@danbri.org>, 'Dan Connolly' <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: "'semantic-web@w3.org'" <semantic-web@w3.org>, 'public-lod' <public-lod@w3.org>, Pete Johnston <Pete.Johnston@eduserv.org.uk>, 'Thomas Baker' <tbaker@tbaker.de>
> I don't believe we considered explicitly the scenario in which > profile= gets lost, but something like RDFa is not permitted for > HTML5. Maybe Pete or Tom (cc:'d) can comment further? I think you are right that this scenario wasn't really considered. > My personal > guess at a DC view would be something like "well if we don't get RDFa, > then don't take @profile away!" Yes, agreed. > the assumption being that RDFa would > come with some namespace abbreviation mechanism, whether xmlns:-based > or otherwise. I doubt the DC community would be satisfied by the > current Microdata design in which each use of a DC property would be > identified by its full URI. I think this is a pretty safe bet! Just my personal view... but I find it hard to imagine that this would be acceptable to the viewer DC community (though I'm not actually convinced that there is such a thing as a DC community view on anything). Andy -- Andy Powell Research Programme Director Eduserv t: 01225 474319 m: 07989 476710 twitter: @andypowe11 blog: efoundations.typepad.com www.eduserv.org.uk
Received on Thursday, 25 February 2010 11:37:45 UTC