- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:47:26 +0000
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: semantic-web@w3.org, public-lod <public-lod@w3.org>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
On 24 Feb 2010, at 16:55, Dan Connolly wrote: > On a somewhat related topic... as RDFa matures, the need for GRDDL > somewhat fades. I wonder, though... to what extent is GRDDL > used in the linked data community? Not much AFAICT. > What tools consume it? What content providers produce it? The Sindice perspective: For well-known formats such as microformats or RDFa, we'd rather build a detector and manage the parsing on our side, which is easy to do and gives access to the vast amount of content that doesn't have a GRDDL declaration. In theory, GRDDL should allow Sindice to ingest RDF from sites that publish custom app-specific XML. In practice, there are no data producers that have a GRDDL transform and aren't publishing in a “normal” RDF format as well. Best, Richard > > See also: > > The details of data in documents: GRDDL, profiles, and HTML5 > By Dan Connolly in HTML, Semantic Web, Web Architecture, XML on August > 22, 2008 7:45 PM > http://www.w3.org/QA/2008/08/the_details_of_data_in_documen.html > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E > >
Received on Wednesday, 24 February 2010 20:48:01 UTC