W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > February 2010

Why are RDF containers (rdf:Seq etc.) so little appreciated?

From: Axel Rauschmayer <axel@rauschma.de>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 15:28:33 +0100
Message-Id: <815D84D7-C381-4846-9231-C6AEB49F1DA0@rauschma.de>
To: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
In contrast to RDF collections (rdf:List), they have a stable identity and don't use nested resources (=easy to remove). Furthermore, standard RDFS inferencing can be used to infer membership as the property rdfs:member.

Yet, most RDF vocabularies that I know of use collections and syntaxes such as Turtle have syntactic sugar for collections, but not for containers. Why is that?


Received on Saturday, 13 February 2010 14:29:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:16:03 UTC