Dan Brickley wrote: > +cc: Ed Summers > > On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Chris Sizemore > <Chris.Sizemore@bbc.co.uk> wrote: > >> the main problem is gonna be the cognitive dissonance over whether a tweet >> is an information or non-information resource and how many URIs are needed >> to fully rep a tweet... >> so, who's gonna volunteer to publish the linked data version of Twitter >> data, a la db/wiki[pedia] ... >> > > Based on http://blogs.loc.gov/loc/2010/04/how-tweet-it-is-library-acquires-entire-twitter-archive/ > it looks like the Library of Congress might be taking on that job. And > on the strength of the LCSH RDF work, it might even be feasible... > > Dan > > > All, Remember: http://semantictwitter.appspot.com/ ? -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehenReceived on Friday, 16 April 2010 12:47:56 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:26 UTC