W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > April 2010

Re: twitter's annotation and metadata

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 08:47:18 -0400
Message-ID: <4BC85C56.3080900@openlinksw.com>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
CC: Chris Sizemore <Chris.Sizemore@bbc.co.uk>, adasal <adam.saltiel@gmail.com>, Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>, public-lod <public-lod@w3.org>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
Dan Brickley wrote:
> +cc: Ed Summers
>
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Chris Sizemore
> <Chris.Sizemore@bbc.co.uk> wrote:
>   
>> the main problem is gonna be the cognitive dissonance over whether a tweet
>> is an information or non-information resource and how many URIs are needed
>> to fully rep a tweet...
>> so, who's gonna volunteer to publish the linked data version of Twitter
>> data, a la db/wiki[pedia] ...
>>     
>
> Based on http://blogs.loc.gov/loc/2010/04/how-tweet-it-is-library-acquires-entire-twitter-archive/
> it looks like the Library of Congress might be taking on that job. And
> on the strength of the LCSH RDF work, it might even be feasible...
>
> Dan
>
>
>   
All,


Remember: http://semantictwitter.appspot.com/ ?

-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	      
President & CEO 
OpenLink Software     
Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen 
Received on Friday, 16 April 2010 12:47:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:26 UTC