- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 19:23:46 -0400
- To: Ian Davis <lists@iandavis.com>
- CC: public-lod <public-lod@w3.org>
Ian Davis wrote: > On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Kingsley Idehen > <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: > >> Ian Davis wrote: >> >>> Kingsley, >>> >>> You should address your question directly to the project organisers, >>> we're a technology provider and host some of the data but it is not up >>> to us when or where the dumps get shared. My understanding is that >>> because this is officially sanctioned data they want to ensure that >>> the provenance is built into the datasets properly. My hope and wish >>> is that the commitment to making dumps available will be built into >>> the guidelines the UK Government are working on. But those won't be >>> issued during this month because of the election. >>> >>> >> Okay, but the need for dumps is working its way into the fundamental >> guidelines for Linked Open Data. >> >> As you can imagine (and I have raised these concerns on the UK Govt mailing >> list a few times), this project is high profile and closely associated with >> Linked Open Data; thus, unclarity about these RDF dumps is confusing to say >> the very least. >> >> Anyway, I am set for now, will wait and see re. what happens post election >> etc.. >> >> > > > I should also add that some datasets do not have dumps, e.g. the > reference time and dates > > http://reference.data.gov.uk/doc/hour/2010-03-23T21 > > Ian > > Yep, I have that: http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/about/html/http/reference.data.gov.uk/doc/hour/2010-03-23T21 :-) -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Thursday, 15 April 2010 23:24:14 UTC