W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > April 2010

Re: [Patterns] Materialize Inferences (was Re: Triple materialization at publisher level)

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 12:12:02 -0400
Message-ID: <4BBF51D2.5050007@openlinksw.com>
To: Vasiliy Faronov <vfaronov@gmail.com>
CC: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Leigh Dodds <leigh.dodds@talis.com>, public-lod <public-lod@w3.org>
Vasiliy Faronov wrote:
> I think Dan has spotted a very good rule of thumb for subclass
> materialization with his notion of "mid-level" classes.
> Here's another rule of thumb I can think of: materialize inferences that
> map your data to better known, and more widely deployed, vocabularies.
> Example. A consulting company could develop a custom ontology for
> describing businesses. Let's say it has a class ex:BusinessEntity which
> has owl:equivalentClass gr:BusinessEntity. It's likely that some LD
> clients will be familiar with the GoodRelations vocabulary but unable or
> unwilling to do reasoning over custom ontologies. In this case,
> explicitly spelling out that every ex:BusinessEntity is also a
> gr:BusinessEntity may be helpful.



Kingsley Idehen	      
President & CEO 
OpenLink Software     
Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen 
Received on Friday, 9 April 2010 16:12:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:16:05 UTC