W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > April 2010

Re: Using predicates which have no ontology?

From: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 16:29:22 +0200
Message-ID: <k2pcf8107641004060729j27402ce2w4196b9efd16b93a8@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
Cc: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
Michael,

On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Michael Hausenblas
<michael.hausenblas@deri.org> wrote:
>
> Ed,
>
>> Would it be hard to remove the empty literal assertions? e.g.
>
> Fixed now. Dunno why I had it there in the first place ;)

Nice!

>> It's interesting that the latest efforts to create a Link Relation
>> Registry seem to be intentionally avoiding publishing machine readable
>> data for the registry [1]. I was wondering if Mark Nottingham's
>> efforts to revamp link relations might present a good opportunity for
>> us to lobby the IETF to start publishing a bit of RDFa for the link
>> relations registry...
>
> Agree! Let's lobby :)

Hear hear! :) Still, those statements at [1] indicates that this might
need some further discussion..

My gut feeling is that if IANA servers are hit with requests for [2]:s
anyhow (a reasonable effect of those already being specified), a 303
to something off-site (e.g. purl.org) wouldn't put much more strain on
them. And would be so very beneficial to the linked data web (which
should use caching of anything central anyway; for a long time).

Best regards,
Niklas

[1]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-09#appendix-A
[2]: http://www.iana.org/assignments/relation/*


> Cheers,
>      Michael
>
> --
> Dr. Michael Hausenblas
> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre
> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway
> Ireland, Europe
> Tel. +353 91 495730
> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
> http://sw-app.org/about.html
>
>
>
>> From: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
>> Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 09:37:49 -0400
>> To: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
>> Subject: Re: Using predicates which have no ontology?
>> Resent-From: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
>> Resent-Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 13:38:22 +0000
>>
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> Would it be hard to remove the empty literal assertions? e.g.
>>
>> --
>> <http://www.iana.org/assignments/relation/alternate> a awol:RelationType ;
>>      rdfs:label "alternate" ;
>>      dcterms:dateAccepted "" ;
>>      dcterms:description "" ;
>>      rdfs:isDefinedBy <http://www.iana.org/go/rfc4287> .
>> --
>>
>> It's interesting that the latest efforts to create a Link Relation
>> Registry seem to be intentionally avoiding publishing machine readable
>> data for the registry [1]. I was wondering if Mark Nottingham's
>> efforts to revamp link relations might present a good opportunity for
>> us to lobby the IETF to start publishing a bit of RDFa for the link
>> relations registry...
>>
>> //Ed
>>
>> [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-09#appendix-A
>>
Received on Tuesday, 6 April 2010 14:30:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:26 UTC