W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > April 2010

Re: Using predicates which have no ontology?

From: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 09:37:49 -0400
Message-ID: <q2tf032cc061004050637k7e96b2bfo6905abc27a4d1fe3@mail.gmail.com>
To: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
Hi Michael,

Would it be hard to remove the empty literal assertions? e.g.

<http://www.iana.org/assignments/relation/alternate> a awol:RelationType ;
     rdfs:label "alternate" ;
     dcterms:dateAccepted "" ;
     dcterms:description "" ;
     rdfs:isDefinedBy <http://www.iana.org/go/rfc4287> .

It's interesting that the latest efforts to create a Link Relation
Registry seem to be intentionally avoiding publishing machine readable
data for the registry [1]. I was wondering if Mark Nottingham's
efforts to revamp link relations might present a good opportunity for
us to lobby the IETF to start publishing a bit of RDFa for the link
relations registry...


[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-09#appendix-A
Received on Monday, 5 April 2010 13:38:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:16:04 UTC