W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > April 2010

Re: Using predicates which have no ontology?

From: Story Henry <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 00:29:09 +0100
Cc: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
Message-Id: <3B32DEAB-A2EB-4815-B9F6-FCBCF86FFA65@bblfish.net>
To: nathan@webr3.org
On 2 Apr 2010, at 23:53, Nathan wrote:

> Hi All,
> 
> Any guidance on using predicates in linked data / rdf which do not come
> from rdfs/owl. Specifically I'm considering the range of:
>  http://www.iana.org/assignments/relation/*

Ah is that something you found in the AtomOWL spec?

Perhaps we should just give them other names, until the IETF places RDF representations
at those locations, which I imagine could take forever.

Henry

> 
> such as edit, self, related etc - with additional consideration to the
> thought that these will end up in rdf via RDFa/grddl etc v soon if not
> already.
> 
> Any guidance?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Nathan
> 
Received on Friday, 2 April 2010 23:29:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:26 UTC