W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > September 2009

Re: What about music-related URIs???

From: Yves Raimond <yves.raimond@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 17:01:46 +0100
Message-ID: <82593ac00909060901j2a49eb40o4f99d4f4a143dff8@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kurt J <kurtjx@gmail.com>
Cc: music-ontology-specification-group@googlegroups.com, Linking Open Data <public-lod@w3.org>
I guess it will be as soon as we actually send them a  patch :-) I did
some work on that last year (just rdf/xml) but as nick said, the
codebase has been changing very fast since then... We should gather
efforts  once the big scary release is out and make it happen!


On 9/6/09, Kurt J <kurtjx@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>> It is a dilemma indeed. I think we need to make a effort to get RDF/
>> RDFa on to musicbrainz.org and then we can use the 'proper' URIs. I
>> have been holding back from doing this because the codebase has been
>> changing so much - but there is a big new release coming soon....
> i like using the actual musicbrainz URIs as well.  to be clear, the
> artist URI would be of the form
> http://musicbrainz.org/artist/<mbid number>
> similarly the track URI would be
> http://musicbrainz.org/track/<mbid number>
> and the release (record) URI would be
> http://musicbrainz.org/release/<mbid number>
> i've noticed that currently the release-based URIs return 404 unless
> you put '.html' on the end
> http://musicbrainz.org/release/3de4b060-3930-4d6f-8c4f-7135b7d70fb6  ->  404
> http://musicbrainz.org/release/3de4b060-3930-4d6f-8c4f-7135b7d70fb6.html
> -> page about this release
> track and artist URIs seem to redirect sensibly to a human-readable page.
> So do you advocate using the Musicbrainz 'proper' URIs now?  Any guess
> on how soon they might include RDF(a) ?
> -Kurt J
Received on Sunday, 6 September 2009 16:02:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:15:59 UTC