- From: Jun Zhao <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:44:04 +0000
- To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- CC: Georgi Kobilarov <georgi.kobilarov@gmx.de>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
Hi Michael, Michael Hausenblas wrote: > Georgi, All, > > I like the discussion, and as it seems to be a recurrent pattern as pointed > out by Yves (which might be a sign that we need to invest some more time > into it) I've tried to sum up a bit and started a straw-man proposal for a > more coarse-grained solution [1]. Thanks for setting up this. To me, not only the dynamics of data that matters, but also the ability of getting notified of changes, of tracking the changes, of finding out what has been changed, and of finding explanations and evidence for justifying the changes. I don't think /dynamics/ could cover all these. Would this vocabulary in [1] also consider use cases other than dynamics? It seems that some of the above use cases have been discussed somehow in the previous threads. I would be very interested to see them continued:). Cheers, Jun [1] http://esw.w3.org/topic/DatasetDynamics
Received on Friday, 20 November 2009 15:44:34 UTC