- From: Damian Steer <d.steer@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:00:13 +0000
- To: Georgi Kobilarov <georgi.kobilarov@gmx.de>
- CC: public-lod@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Georgi Kobilarov wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to start a discussion about a topic that I think is getting > increasingly important: RDF update feeds. > > The linked data project is starting to move away from releases of large data > dumps towards incremental updates. But how can services consuming rdf data > from linked data sources get notified about changes? Is anyone aware of > activities to standardize such rdf update feeds, or at least aware of > projects already providing any kind of update feed at all? And related to > that: How do we deal with RDF diffs? There have been a few suggestions over the years. [1] immediately jumps to mind, for example. Would sparql update work as a patch format? Generating it might be tricky, and I'm not sure fancy running syndicated updates without checking them first. On the other hand I interact with larger stores using sparql, so simply recording the updates sent would work. Damian [1] <http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Diff> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAksCyIcACgkQAyLCB+mTtykN+QCg6Z89EqNNBwHcbfi0Aj+8nh2L YSoAnj4RnZXwU9ycNoKlG2qVyhbLcOYr =uEMt -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 17 November 2009 16:00:39 UTC