W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > May 2009

Re: OWL and LOD

From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 11:20:44 +0100
To: John Goodwin <John.Goodwin@ordnancesurvey.co.uk>
Cc: public-lod@w3.org, semantic-web@w3.org
Message-Id: <1242123644.15673.12.camel@ophelia2.g5n.co.uk>
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 10:49 +0100, John Goodwin wrote:
> I was just curious how many OWL sceptics we have in the LOD community?
> Rightly or wrongly I get the impression there are a few?

If I could be sure that my SPARQL query environment would use OWL
reasoning to fill in the gaps in its knowledge, then I'd be more
inclined to publish OWL data. But right now there is a dearth of
high-quality, widely-used OWL implementations.

-- 
Toby Inkster <mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Tuesday, 12 May 2009 10:21:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:20 UTC