- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 10:08:57 -0500
- To: Daniel Schwabe <dschwabe@inf.puc-rio.br>
- CC: public-lod@w3.org, Andraz Tori <andraz@zemanta.com>, Story Henry <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Daniel Schwabe wrote: > On 02/03/2009 10:55, Kingsley Idehen wrote: >> ... >> De-referencable URIs, Negotable Representation of Resource >> Descriptions, and other elements of the Linked Data Web's FORCE as >> are simply there to be tapped by current/next generation of >> innovators on the Web and/or across the Enterprise en route to >> solving real problems. Examples ares would include: >> >> 1. Identity (decentralized and non-repudiatable variety via foaf+ssl >> which is ultimately going to be sparql+ssl) -- then we can fix mail, >> commenting and other critical aspects of the Web and Internet > Hmmm, are you proposing this as an alternative to, say, OpenID? Can > you elaborate on this a bit more? > > Cheers > D > > -- > Daniel Schwabe > Tel:+55-21-3527 1500 r. 4356 > Fax: +55-21-3527 1530 > http://www.inf.puc-rio.br/~dschwabe Dept. de Informatica, PUC-Rio > R. M. de S. Vicente, 225 > Rio de Janeiro, RJ 22453-900, Brasil > Daniel, No, this is an addition to the stack. It's focus is de-referencing without Web Page based authentication in the mix. As per my link to foaf+ssl in my earlier response, Henry Story has covered OpenID and FOAF+SSL matter in depth. Links: 1. http://blogs.sun.com/bblfish/entry/what_does_foaf_ssl_give -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Received on Monday, 2 March 2009 15:09:34 UTC