Sent from my mobile, which insists on top posting On 25 Jun 2009, at 12:16, Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk> wrote: > On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 11:59 +0200, Bernhard Schandl wrote: > >> However many "newbies" to RDF and ontologies are confused by this, >> because the triple >> >> foaf:Agent foaf:holdsAccount foaf:OnlineAccount . >> >> is actually not contained in the ontology. > > What needs to be communicated is that: > > [ a foaf:Agent ] foaf:holdsAccount [ a foaf:OnlineAccount ] . > > instead. Those triples are not actually in the ontology itself +1 I was writing a similar reply, but Toby beat me to it (and did a fancy diagram). In my experience the issue is conveying the implication of the schema. DamianReceived on Thursday, 25 June 2009 11:44:10 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:41:34 GMT