W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > June 2009

Re: RDFa vs RDF/XML and content negotiation

From: Pierre-Antoine Champin <swlists-040405@champin.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:13:20 +0100
Message-ID: <4A435BD0.709@champin.net>
To: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
CC: public-lod@w3.org
Le 24/06/2009 08:21, Danny Ayers a écrit :
> As far as I'm aware we don't yet have an easy templating engine for
> RDFa, so I suspect having that as the source is probably a good choice
> for typical Web applications.

you may be interested in Tal4Rdf, a template system for RDF that can 
produce HTML/XHTML (any XML in fact).

It is not dedicated to RDFa, and I still do not have any RDFa example, 
but there should be no major problem to produce XHTML+RDFa with it.

  regards

   pa

[1] http://champin.net/t4r
>
> As mentioned already GRDDL is available for transforming on the fly,
> though I'm not sure of the level of client engine support at present.
> Ditto providing a SPARQL endpoint is another way of maximising the
> surface area of the data.
>
> But the key step has clearly been taken, that decision to publish data
> directly without needing the human element to interpret it.
>
> I claim *win* for the Semantic Web, even if it'll still be a few years
> before we see applications exploiting it in a way that provides real
> benefit for the end user.
>
> my 2 cents.
>
> Cheers,
> Danny.
>
Received on Thursday, 25 June 2009 11:14:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:21 UTC