W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > June 2009

Re: LOD Data Sets, Licensing, and AWS

From: Peter Ansell <ansell.peter@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:04:17 +1000
Message-ID: <a1be7e0e0906231604w3f2781faq424b3d9a1a13161e@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ian Davis <lists@iandavis.com>
Cc: public-lod@w3.org
2009/6/24 Ian Davis <lists@iandavis.com>

> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>wrote:
>>> Using licensing to ensure the data providers URIs are always preserved
>>> delivers low cost and implicit attribution. This is what I believe CC-BY-SA
>>> delivers. There is nothing wrong with granular attribution if compliance is
>>> low cost. Personally, I think we are on the verge of an "Attribution
>>> Economy", and said economy will encourage contributions from a plethora of
>>> high quality data providers (esp. from the tradition media realm).
> Regardless of any attribution economy, CC-BY-SA is basically unenforceable
> for data so is not appropriate. You can't copyright the diameter of the
> moon.
> Ian

Interestingly, there is a large economy involved with patenting gene
sequences. Aren't they facts also? Why is patenting different to copyright
in this respect?


Received on Tuesday, 23 June 2009 23:04:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:15:57 UTC