W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > June 2009

Re: Common Tag - semantic tagging convention

From: Benjamin O'Steen <bosteen@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:19:53 +0100
To: Rob Styles <rob.styles@talis.com>
Cc: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>, public-lod@w3.org, Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>, François Dongier <francois.dongier@gmail.com>, Andraz Tori <andraz@zemanta.com>
Message-Id: <1245323993.14654.1.camel@localhost>
On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 11:55 +0100, Rob Styles wrote:
> On 18 Jun 2009, at 11:48, Danny Ayers wrote:
> 
> > 2009/6/18 Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>:
> >
> >> That said, why not use simply dc:creator and dc:date to this effect?
> >
> > Right. dc:date would seem a good choice, though I reckon foaf:maker
> > might be a better option than dc:creator as the object is a resource
> > (a foaf:Agent) rather than a literal. While it's likely to mean an
> > extra node in many current scenarios, it offers significantly more
> > prospect for linking data (and less ambiguity).
> 
> dcterms:creator would also allow for use of a resource. Bibliontology  
> uses dcterms over dc.
> 
> rob

How about dcterms:created as a refinement on dc:date too?

http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-created


Ben
Received on Thursday, 18 June 2009 11:25:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:21 UTC