W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > June 2009

Re: Common Tag - semantic tagging convention

From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:05:11 +0100
To: Valeska Oleary <voleary@idgenterprise.com>
Cc: Peter Mika <pmika@yahoo-inc.com>, François Dongier <francois.dongier@gmail.com>, Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>, Yves Raimond <yves.raimond@gmail.com>, Andraz Tori <andraz@zemanta.com>, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1244819111.29842.28.camel@ophelia2.g5n.co.uk>
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 10:31 -0400, Valeska Oleary wrote:
> It’s hard to comment without understanding the use cases and
> scenarios, but high level speaking I’m inclined to think date is a
> valuable piece of information to most publishers.

I imagine the date of publication of an article, plus dates of
modification and other document lifecycle dates are valuable to most
publishers.

The date an article has had a particular tag added though is probably of
secondary importance.

-- 
Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Received on Friday, 12 June 2009 15:05:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:21 UTC