- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:05:11 +0100
- To: Valeska Oleary <voleary@idgenterprise.com>
- Cc: Peter Mika <pmika@yahoo-inc.com>, François Dongier <francois.dongier@gmail.com>, Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>, Yves Raimond <yves.raimond@gmail.com>, Andraz Tori <andraz@zemanta.com>, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 10:31 -0400, Valeska Oleary wrote: > It’s hard to comment without understanding the use cases and > scenarios, but high level speaking I’m inclined to think date is a > valuable piece of information to most publishers. I imagine the date of publication of an article, plus dates of modification and other document lifecycle dates are valuable to most publishers. The date an article has had a particular tag added though is probably of secondary importance. -- Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Received on Friday, 12 June 2009 15:05:53 UTC