Thank you all. Very helpful. On 08/06/2009 12:45, "Tim Berners-Lee" <timbl@w3.org> wrote: > Agreed. Go for CC0. > Disclaimers are an orthogonal issue I *hope*. > > On 2009-06 -08, at 00:13, Marc Wick wrote: > >> >>>> Added some words in the about - any advice as to what the licence >>>> might be? >>>> I guess there is some cc licence that corresponds to: >>>> "The information is provided as-is and without any warranty. >>>> It is freely available for any use as you wish." >>> I would suggest you want the Open Database Licence [1]. >>> [1]: http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/ >> >> Definitely not. The Open Database License is a kind of share-alike license. >> share-alike does not work for data and cannot be considered open. It prevents >> nearly all interesting use cases and is the contrary of "freely available for >> any use as you wish". >> The cc0 licenses Nathan is suggesting are more what you are looking for. >> >> Best >> >> Marc > >Received on Monday, 8 June 2009 21:19:18 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:41:34 GMT