- From: Ryan Shaw <ryanshaw@ischool.berkeley.edu>
- Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:36:51 -0700
- To: Simon Reinhardt <simon.reinhardt@koeln.de>
- Cc: public-lod@w3.org
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 4:30 AM, Simon Reinhardt<simon.reinhardt@koeln.de> wrote: > I just went by what I saw missing at http://linkedevents.org/ontology/ - and > there both the HTML and the RDF/XML documents map "only" to DC, CIDOC-CRM, > the Event Ontology and DOLCE+DnS Ultralite. Yes, this is true. Although we discuss all models listed above in our report we do not have mappings to all of them in the RDF/XML. We do not map to ABC because the model is sufficiently different that it did not make sense to make a formal mapping. The RDF/OWL version EventsML-G2 is not available yet, so we're waiting on that. F uses DOLCE+DnS Ultralite so the mapping is via that ontology. I would like to map to OpenCYC but I'm still not sure of the relationships. We have mappings to BIO which are used for the display of the Congressional Biography events at <http://linkedevents.org>, but I still need to add these statements to the RDF/XML at <http://linkedevents.org/ontology>.
Received on Friday, 31 July 2009 15:37:31 UTC