- From: Ryan Shaw <ryanshaw@ischool.berkeley.edu>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:38:48 -0700
- To: public-lod@w3.org
- Cc: Raphaël Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>, Lynda Hardman <Lynda.Hardman@cwi.nl>
My colleagues Raphaël Troncy and Lynda Hardman and I have recently published an event ontology which is heavily based on Yves' event ontology but which tries to address some of the clarity issues that Pat has raised. You can find it at http://linkedevents.org/ontology/ There is an accompanying tech report in which we discuss the modeling decisions we made and review a number of other ontologies covering events. Where possible we provide mappings between our properties and properties from these other ontologies in the ontology file at http://linkedevents.org/ontology/2009-07-28/rdfxml The tech report should be online next week (we're currently making some final revisions. Our primary interest is in events as reported in news or represented in historical narrative, which is quite different from, e.g., a scientific notion of an event as a well-defined process or as part of a causal mechanism. I think there is probably room for several different event ontologies given the fuzziness of the concept and the different modes of understanding (i.e. science vs. history vs. law vs. "everyday" practical understanding). But we believe this one provides a useful balance between simplicity and clarity for the kind of use cases we have in mind. There are a number of examples of events modeled using our vocabulary at http://view.linkedevents.org/session/browse Note that the dataset at the URL above also includes some events, specifically the Emma Goldman and Congressional Biography ones, modeled using other vocabularies which we have mapped to ours. Your feedback (even harsh criticism) is welcome! Cheers, Ryan Shaw
Received on Thursday, 30 July 2009 05:39:29 UTC