W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > December 2009

Re: Contd: [pedantic-web] question about sioc / foaf usage

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:32:04 -0500
Message-ID: <4B15A774.2090009@openlinksw.com>
To: pedantic-web@googlegroups.com
CC: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, SIOC-Dev <sioc-dev@googlegroups.com>
Nathan wrote:
> [SNIP]
>> perfect, thanks kingsley :)
>>
>> only q (which i still don't follow) is that afaik I *need* to specify in
>>  rdf where one can find the HTML document, no point describing something
>> people can't find... noted that in you're own rdf you use:
>> <resource>
>> <http://www.openlinksw.com/schema/attribution#isDescribedUsing> <url>
>>
>> i essentially need the equiv for anything;
>>
>>   <http://example.lod/uri/html-document-123>
>> 	<canBeFound> <here/URL> .
>> or
>> 	<has_link> <here/URL> .
>>
>> the thing I'm describing can be found at web address, ie show the human
>> this version etc etc (if you follow)
>>     
>
> perhaps foaf:page ? like dbpedia uses?
>
>   
No problem, but note my comment re. use of icons as visual cue if you 
are making an HTML based browser page. Either way, foaf:page is fine.

-- 


Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	      Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
President & CEO 
OpenLink Software     Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Received on Tuesday, 1 December 2009 23:32:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:24 UTC