W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > September 2008

Re: New Calais proxy could grow Linked Data Cloud

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:42:22 -0400
Message-ID: <48D9004E.7080808@openlinksw.com>
To: Tom Heath <tom.heath@talis.com>
CC: Chris Sizemore <Chris.Sizemore@bbc.co.uk>, public-lod@w3.org

Tom Heath wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> 2008/9/23 Chris Sizemore <Chris.Sizemore@bbc.co.uk>:
>   
>> does anyone else expect/hope that the "Linked Data" part of "dereferenceable
>> Linked Data URIs " implies that these URIs will be linked up to, for
>> instance, dbPedia, umbel, musicbrainz, etc etc? otherwise it wouldn't really
>> be "linked data" per se, no?
>>     
>
> I hope that that's the case, although I don't know if it will turn out
> that way. It may be a case of Calais confusing Linked Data with
> linkable data. It is certainly my expectation (and that of the entire
> LD community, I would argue) that "Linked Data" does actually include
> those links, in case anyone was in any doubt ;)
>
> Tom.
>
>
>   
Chris / Tom,

I would decompose Linked Data, in this context, as follows:

1. URIs can be used to de-reference an RDF based resource description
2. Resource description includes de-rferencable URIs across Subject, 
Predicate, and Object (where applicable) in constituent triples

Linkage to other Linked Data spaces  (instances and classes) is a 
desired added bonus, but not the essential definition (imho) :-)

-- 


Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	      Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
President & CEO 
OpenLink Software     Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Received on Tuesday, 23 September 2008 14:43:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:41:27 GMT